Skip to main content

Employees Won Case of Negligence Against UBER

 The case of Aslam, Farrar & Others v. Uber BV & Others in the United Kingdom

In this case, a group of Uber drivers sued the company, arguing that they should be classified as workers rather than independent contractors, and therefore entitled to certain employment rights and benefits.

The drivers claimed that Uber had been negligent in their duty of care towards them by classifying them as self-employed contractors, which resulted in the denial of employment rights such as minimum wage and holiday pay. The drivers argued that they should be considered workers and entitled to these benefits.

In 2016, the Employment Tribunal in the UK ruled in favor of the drivers, stating that they were indeed workers and not self-employed contractors. The tribunal found that Uber had significant control over the drivers' work, including setting fares and terms of service, and therefore had a duty of care towards them.

The ruling emphasized that the drivers were not operating as independent businesses, but rather were integral to Uber's business model. As a result, the drivers were entitled to employment rights and benefits, including minimum wage and holiday pay.

This case highlighted the importance of properly classifying workers and the potential consequences for companies that fail to fulfill their duty of care towards employees. It also underscored the need for businesses to carefully assess the nature of their working relationships to ensure compliance with employment laws and regulations.

UK Test to Determine Employment Status

The UK Employment Rights Act provides a test to determine the employment status of an individual. This test is crucial in determining the rights and protections that individuals are entitled to in the workplace. The test consists of three main categories:

1. Control: This category assesses the level of control exercised by the employer over the individual. Factors considered include whether the employer dictates how, when, and where the work is performed, and whether the individual has the freedom to choose how to carry out their tasks.

2. Personal Service: This category examines whether the individual is required to provide their services personally or if they have the right to send a substitute. If the individual is obligated to personally perform the work, it indicates an employment relationship.

3. Mutuality of Obligation: This category looks at the presence of an ongoing obligation for the employer to provide work and for the individual to accept it. If there is an expectation of continued work and acceptance of that work, it suggests an employment relationship.

Other factors, such as the provision of equipment, integration into the business, and financial risk, may also be considered in determining employment status. The overall assessment considers the totality of the relationship between the individual and the employer.

Determining employment status is crucial as it determines the rights and benefits individuals are entitled to, including protections such as minimum wage, holiday pay, and protection against unfair dismissal.

It is important to seek legal advice for a comprehensive understanding of the test and its application to specific situations.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Employee Goes Berserk and Explodes at the Rubis Coverley Service Station Pump in Barbados: Was This a Preventable Workplace Breakdown?

Image
A Workplace Commentary on the Rubis Coverley Incident By  Peter MacD Earle BSc, LLM, Employment Law Consultant On Friday, May 17, 2025, Barbadians awoke to disturbing news involving the aftermath of a workplace conflict that escalated dramatically. Daniel Arnold Vincent Belle, 38, a former employee of the Rubis Coverley gas station in Christ Church, appeared in the District “B” Magistrates’ Court and admitted to causing extensive damage to the station—an estimated $7,000 worth—just days after his dismissal from the company. The incident involved the smashing of a glass door, breaking two windows, damaging a display unit, and tearing off seven fuel pump nozzles. Surveillance footage led to Belle’s arrest in Oistins. While this act of destruction was clearly criminal, the context in which it occurred raises serious concerns about workplace conflict, employer responsibilities, and the role of mental health in employment relations. . Let me be clear from the outset: I do not have any a...
Read more

Barbados' Minimum Wage Time Bomb: Are Businesses Being Set Up to Fail?

Image
   Peter MacD Earle BSc, LLM Employment Law Leicester De Montfort Law School Effective June 1, 2025, Barbados will implement a new minimum wage of $420 per week, a 23.5% increase from the current $340. In addition, legislation proposes an automatic 2% annual wage increase starting in January 2026. But beneath this progressive façade lies a stark, structural truth: Barbados has neither the machinery to enforce the law nor the political will to protect the most vulnerable. While this policy signals social justice on paper, in practice it could collapse under its own contradictions—and set workers, employers, and the economy up for failure. ________________________________________ The Illusion of Legal Protection While the government trumpets the wage hike as a win for working-class families, Barbados remains woefully unequipped to enforce the new standard. Consider: • Thousands of workers never received the current $340 minimum wage. • Many will not receive the new $420 rate...
Read more

Former BWA Boss in Barbados Fired from WASA After $13.4M Plan Collapses

Image
  By Peter MacD Earle BSc. LLM | Employment Law Consultant | June 2025 From BWA to WASA: The Rise and Fall of Keithroy Halliday St. Kitts-born Keithroy Halliday was appointed General Manager of the Barbados Water Authority (BWA) on February 15, 2017, bringing a strong track record in strategic leadership and regional public sector reform. Over the next seven years, he would become a defining figure in the BWA’s modernization efforts—managing national emergencies such as the South Coast sewage crisis and spearheading an island-wide mains replacement initiative. By 2020, Halliday had risen to Acting Chief Executive Officer, a role he held during a period of deep organizational restructuring. His resignation in August 2024 marked the end of a significant chapter in the BWA’s evolution—and the beginning of a controversial new role abroad as CEO of Trinidad and Tobago’s Water and Sewerage Authority (WASA), from which he would be abruptly dismissed less than a year later amid sweeping po...
Read more