Barbados - Margaret Wharton vs. the Bank of Nova Scotia - Constructive dismissal Case
Constructive Dismissal
Constructive dismissal refers to a situation in which an employee resigns from their job due to a fundamental breach of their employment contract by the employer. This breach may involve actions, omissions, or changes in the employment terms and conditions that are so significant that they effectively make it impossible for the employee to continue working in their current role. Constructive dismissal is often considered a last resort when an employee believes they have no other option but to resign due to intolerable working conditions.
For a claim of constructive dismissal to be valid in Barbados or a country like the UK, certain conditions must generally be met:
Fundamental Breach of Contract: The employer must have committed a serious breach of the employment contract, such as a significant change in job duties, a unilateral reduction in pay, harassment, or a failure to provide a safe working environment.
Employee Resignation: The employee must resign from their job in response to the employer's breach. It is crucial that the employee makes it clear that they are resigning due to the employer's actions or omissions.
Reasonable Response: The employee's decision to resign must be a reasonable response to the employer's breach. If an employee continues to work without protesting or raises their concerns without resigning, they may be considered to have accepted the changes or conditions.
Exhaustion of Internal Procedures: In many cases, the employee is expected to have exhausted internal grievance procedures and tried to resolve the issue with the employer before resigning. Failing to do so may affect the employee's claim.
Timeliness: The resignation should occur promptly after the breach, and the employee should not continue working for an extended period under the unacceptable conditions.
If an employee successfully claims constructive dismissal, they are effectively treated as having been unfairly dismissed by their employer. They may be entitled to various remedies, including compensation for wrongful dismissal and possibly unfair dismissal, depending on the circumstances.
Employees considering constructive dismissal should seek legal advice and may want to explore other avenues, such as raising grievances or seeking mediation, before making the difficult decision to resign. Constructive dismissal cases can be complex and challenging to prove, so it is essential to gather evidence and follow proper procedures when pursuing such claims.
In case No. 438 of 2005, Margaret Wharton (the plaintiff) brought a constructive dismissal lawsuit against the Bank of Nova Scotia (the defendant). Wharton had been with the bank since 1976 and held various roles, including her final position as District Relationship Officer (DRO). She claimed $81,875.78 in damages for constructive dismissal, along with damages for mental, psychological, and physical injury, interest, and costs. Wharton alleged that after her 2004 promotion, she faced harassment from employees, leading to her constructive dismissal.
The bank denied dismissal, arguing that Wharton left voluntarily and disputed her alleged injuries, losses, and debts. During the trial, Wharton presented testimony and witnesses to support her claims. She eventually resigned after being offered an unsatisfactory role at the bank, citing the hostile work environment caused by harassment as the reason.
The court examined whether there was a breach of the employment contract, resulting in constructive dismissal, and if Wharton was entitled to damages. The plaintiff claimed constructive dismissal due to the defendant's alleged breaches, particularly by Mr. Bowen and Mr. Kinch. The plaintiff's counsel argued that the conduct constituted a fundamental breach of the employment contract, justifying constructive dismissal. The defendant's counsel contended that the plaintiff hadn't proven trust and confidence destruction and that failing to report misconduct hindered the defendant's investigation.
The court found the defendant's employees had engaged in inappropriate behavior, including sexual harassment, abusive language, and accusations of theft, constituting a fundamental breach of the employment contract leading to constructive dismissal. Damages awarded included $56,842.50 as severance pay and $16,235.37 as salary in lieu of notice, totaling $65,640.41, plus 6% interest from the writ filing date. Costs were also awarded to be taxed or agreed upon.
In summary, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, concluding she had been constructively dismissed due to the defendant's breaches and awarded her damages accordingly.
Comments
Post a Comment